ArticleNature communications2026
A physics-informed foundation model for rapid high-fidelity structural response prediction.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A physics-informed foundation model for rapid high-fidelity structural response prediction.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate and rapid prediction of nonlinear structural dynamics is central to structural design, disaster mitigation and resilience assessment, yet conventional finite-element analysis remains too computationally demanding for real-time or portfolio-scale applications. To address this computational bottleneck, we develop SeisGPT, a physics-informed foundation model for high-fidelity response prediction across multistorey buildings with diverse structural types and topologies. Its architecture integrates structural-mechanics priors, storey-resolved structural representations and a spectral decoder that captures modal response propagation while accommodating learnable nonlinear corrections. The model is trained on more than 2 million nonlinear elastoplastic simulations derived from 270,000 automatically generated, code-compliant structural designs and 694 real-world buildings, together comprising over 10 billion response time steps. For previously unseen buildings, SeisGPT predicts displacement and acceleration histories with normalized errors below 5% and achieves an approximately 40,000-fold computational speedup relative to conventional finite-element analysis. By assimilating sparse sensor measurements, SeisGPT reconstructs full-building responses from limited observations and, in shake-table tests, shows closer agreement with measured responses than finite-element simulations, supporting structural-health monitoring and post-earthquake damage-state assessment. These results indicate that physics-informed foundation models can support high-fidelity structural-response prediction, sparse-sensor reconstruction and response-informed downstream structural assessment at inference speeds compatible with real-time and portfolio-scale use.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.