Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42435757›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences2026

Singing Enhances Poetry Learning and Memorization in Preschool Children.

Weijin Hu, Baishen Liang, Yi Du

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Weijin HuState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Science and Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Baishen LiangState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Science and Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yi DuState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Science and Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 32561160135Scientific Foundation of Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences E4JY292266
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preschool years are a critical period for developing advanced sociolinguistic skills, and poetry education provides unique cognitive and cultural benefits. Singing, as an alternative to rote recitation, may enhance this learning, yet empirical evidence remains limited. Across two experiments, we investigated the effects of singing versus recitation on memorizing classical Chinese poems in 118 Mandarin-speaking preschool children. In Experiment 1a, children aged 4-5 years who learned poetry through singing recalled the material more rapidly and fluently than those who learned through rote recitation. Experiment 1b showed that these advantages persisted over a 6-month interval. Experiment 2 demonstrated that singing continued to improve memorization speed, accuracy, and fluency even with increased semantic complexity in children aged 5-6 years. Together, these findings provide strong evidence for a "singing superiority effect," whereby singing enhances both immediate and long-term poem memorization in preschoolers. We discuss potential sensorimotor and motivational mechanisms by which melodic structure supports language memory and propose singing as a practical, developmentally appropriate strategy for early language acquisition.

Indexed as

LearningMemoryPoetry as TopicSingingChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansLanguage DevelopmentMalepoetry educationpoetry memorizationrecitationsinging

Identifiers

PMID42435757
PMCPMC13355920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.