ReviewEuropean eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association2026
Healthcare Professionals' Experiences of Barriers and Facilitators to ARFID Identification, Diagnosis and Treatment: A Rapid Review.
Review in European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Healthcare Professionals' Experiences of Barriers and Facilitators to ARFID Identification, Diagnosis and Treatment: A Rapid Review.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesDespite increasing evidence of the physical and psychosocial impairments associated with Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID), there are currently no national guidelines for its assessment and treatment. In the absence of such guidance, it is crucial to understand the experiences of healthcare professionals (HCPs) involved in ARFID care.
methodThis review included 13 studies exploring HCPs' experiences of accessing or delivering care for individuals with ARFID. The findings were synthesised into three key themes (Kambanis and Thomas 2023): limited knowledge surrounding ARFID (American Psychiatric Association 2022), lack of education and specialised training and (World Health Organization 2019) the need for clear referral pathways and multidisciplinary collaboration.
resultsThe review identified significant gaps in HCPs' understanding of ARFID, including a lack of confidence in clinical decision-making, challenges with differential diagnosis, difficulties navigating referral processes and an absence of established care pathways. These barriers contribute to inconsistent care provision across services.
conclusionsAddressing these gaps through enhanced training, defined referral pathways and improved multidisciplinary collaboration is essential for improving diagnostic accuracy and treatment outcomes. While this review may represent a snapshot of HCP awareness during a period of growing recognition of ARFID, the themes identified appear consistent across settings. These findings underscore the need for a global effort to build HCPs' confidence and competence in recognising and managing ARFID, thereby improving patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.