ReviewAmerican journal of respiratory and critical care medicine2026
Residual disease activity in cystic fibrosis lung disease: implications for clinical management and research.
Review in American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The advent of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators is fundamentally reshaping research and care for people with cystic fibrosis (CF). Despite unprecedented improvements in lung function and predicted survival, a substantial proportion of people with CF continue to exhibit residual disease activity (RDA) across multiple biological and clinical domains. Persistent abnormalities in CFTR function, mucus properties, mucociliary clearance, airway infection, inflammation, and symptom burden indicate that CFTR modulation does not fully normalize airway physiology or eliminate the pathological processes underlying CF lung disease. This review proposes RDA as a conceptual framework for identifying ongoing, potentially modifiable disease processes in people receiving CFTR modulators. Candidate measures across complementary mechanistic and clinical domains are examined, and their potential multidimensional interpretation as a means of supporting more individualized monitoring and treatment decisions is discussed. We consider the implications of RDA for clinical research by identifying key evidence gaps, outlining a stepwise pathway for its definition and validation. We further explore the potential to inform sensitive endpoint selection, enrich study populations, and guide the development of therapies targeting disease processes that persist despite CFTR modulation. As the CF population ages and disease trajectories evolve, care models and research priorities must move beyond conventional measures of disease severity alone. A better understanding and systematic evaluation of RDA may help align long-term clinical management and future trial design with the changing needs of people with CF, while ensuring that therapeutic advances translate into sustained health gains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42435399What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.