Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42435328›Full record

Trial reportUnited European gastroenterology journal2026

Pre-Treatment Serum Albumin Concentration Predicts Clinical Benefit of Long-Term Albumin in Patients With Cirrhosis and Ascites.

Enrico Pompili, Giacomo Zaccherini, Silvia Nardelli, Salvatore Piano, Carlo Alessandria, Sergio Neri, Francesco Giuseppe Foschi, Fabio Levantesi, Aldo Airoldi, Loredana Simone and 12 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in United European gastroenterology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Enrico PompiliDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2467-7027
Giacomo ZaccheriniDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3219-6963
Silvia NardelliDepartment of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Salvatore PianoUnit of Internal Medicine and Hepatology, Department of Medicine-DIMED, University and Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Carlo AlessandriaDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Città Della Salute e Della Scienza Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Sergio NeriDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Francesco Giuseppe FoschiInternal Medicine, Hospital of Faenza, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale of Romagna, Faenza, Italy.
Fabio LevantesiInternal Medicine, Hospital of Bentivoglio, AUSL of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Aldo AiroldiLiver Unit, Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Niguarda Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Loredana SimoneGastroenterology Unit, University Hospital, Ferrara, Italy.
Gianluca Svegliati-BaroniDepartment of Gastroenterology, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Stefano FagiuoliGastroenterology and Transplant Hepatology, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8308-0701
Fabio MarraDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8629-0878
Raffaele CozzolongoDivision of Gastroenterology, National Institute of Gastroenterology S De Bellis, Castellana Grotte (Bari), Italy.
Giulia IannoneDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3424-1289
Maurizio BiselliDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Oliviero RiggioDepartment of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0241-3223
Paolo AngeliUnit of Internal Medicine and Hepatology, Department of Medicine-DIMED, University and Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Mauro BernardiDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Maurizio BaldassarreUnit of Semeiotics, Liver and Alcohol-related Diseases, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7865-394X
Paolo CaraceniDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1439-056X
ANSWER Study Investigators

Funding

Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco, Ministero della Salute FARM6P824 B
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsThe benefit of long-term albumin (LTA) in improving survival and reducing complications in patients with cirrhosis and ascites is not consistently observed across studies, possibly reflecting differences in patient populations and treatment regimens. This study aimed to determine whether baseline serum albumin (SA) levels can predict which patients are most likely to benefit from LTA therapy.

methodsA post hoc analysis of the ANSWER trial was performed in 431 patients randomized to receive standard medical treatment (SMT) alone or SMT plus human albumin (SMT + HA). The interaction between baseline SA and LTA was investigated using competing-risk survival analysis. The primary endpoint was 18-month survival. Secondary endpoints included the incidence of cirrhosis-related complications and hospitalizations.

resultsA significant treatment-by-albumin non-linear interaction was found (p = 0.010), indicating heterogeneity of treatment effect across baseline SA levels with the upper bound of the region of statistically demonstrable benefit occurring at approximately 3.2 g/dL (sHR 0.53, 95% CI 0.28-0.99). In patients with SA ≤ 3.2 g/dL, 18-month survival was significantly higher in the SMT + HA group compared with SMT alone (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.29-0.77; p = 0.0021). No significant survival difference could be demonstrated in patients with SA > 3.2 g/dL (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.41-2.63; p = 0.93). Regardless of baseline SA levels, LTA was associated with improved ascites control and reduced rates of complications and hospitalizations.

conclusionsLTA provides survival and morbidity benefits in patients with mild-to-moderate hypoalbuminemia, whereas in patients with normal SA levels, its benefit appears mainly limited to morbidity reduction. Baseline SA may therefore help in prioritizing LTA therapy when resources are constrained.

Indexed as

AscitesLiver CirrhosisSerum AlbuminAgedBiomarkersFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurvival AnalysisTreatment OutcomeBiomarkersSerum Albumindecompensated cirrhosisparacentesisrandomized controlled trialrefractory ascitessurvival

Identifiers

PMID42435328
PMCPMC13355858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.