ReviewInternational journal of clinical oncology2026
Clinical utility of diagnosing Lynch syndrome in gynecologic oncology: a joint statement from four Japanese academic societies.
Review in International journal of clinical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lynch syndrome (LS) is an autosomal dominant cancer predisposition syndrome, associated with substantially increased risks of colorectal and gynecologic malignancies. Endometrial cancer may serve as a sentinel cancer for LS, placing gynecologists and gynecologic oncologists in a key position for early recognition and long-term management. This joint statement was developed through a multidisciplinary process involving the Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology, the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology, the Japanese Society of Hereditary Tumors, and the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum. It aims to clarify the clinical utility of diagnosing LS in gynecologic oncology within the Japanese healthcare system. We outline a tumor-first paradigm in which universal mismatch repair immunohistochemistry and/or microsatellite instability testing for endometrial cancer facilitates LS detection and provides actionable biomarkers for systemic therapy. This statement summarizes the clinical impact of LS diagnosis across gynecologic oncology. We highlight patterns of synchronous and metachronous malignancies and the prevalence of LS in ovarian cancer, particularly in endometrioid and clear-cell subtypes. We discuss surgical implications, including risk-reducing hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, consideration of concomitant gynecologic risk-reducing surgery during colorectal cancer resection, and individualized ovarian preservation in selected early-stage endometrial cancer or atypical endometrial hyperplasia. We also review the treatment relevance of deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite instability-high status for immune checkpoint inhibitors and emerging fertility-preserving approaches, and address surveillance, cascade testing for relatives, implementation barriers, and the need for multidisciplinary pathways and healthcare system-level support to ensure equitable access to genetic counseling and testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.