ArticleCJEM2026
Provision of timely follow-up and understanding service demand for pediatric emergency department patients with a mental health concern: a quality improvement initiative.
Article in CJEM, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo provide mental health follow-up appointments within 96 h of emergency department (ED) discharge to 100% of eligible pediatric patients within one year of implementation and describe demand patterns for ED mental health presentations.
methodsTwo Canadian pediatric EDs implemented an urgent mental health follow-up appointment process for discharged children who lacked existing access to a mental health provider. Six additional sites contributed data to evaluate visit volume patterns. The arrival date for mental health presentations at all 8 sites was collected, as were date and time of discharge and follow-up appointment for sites A and B. The primary outcome, proportion of appointments meeting the 96-h aim, was calculated for every ten consecutive patients and displayed as a p-chart. Association between aim achievement and day of week was assessed using a chi-square test of independence. For all sites, proportion of ED visits by day of week and month were compared using a chi-square goodness of fit test.
resultsFour hundred and thirty-one children were given a follow-up appointment. 75% of appointments at site A and 62% at site B occurred within the target, falling short of the improvement aim. The likelihood of achieving the target was associated with the day of week of ED presentation (p < 0.001), with a lower proportion of patients visiting the ED Wednesday through Friday receiving an appointment within 96 h. At all sites, ED mental health volume varied by the day of the week and month (p < 0.001): Saturdays and Sundays and the months of July and August had the lowest volumes.
conclusionWhile follow-up appointments were utilized by many ED mental health patients, the timeliness aim was not achieved. The greatest challenge to meeting the 96-h target was for patients presenting Wednesday through Friday. Modifying ED follow-up appointment availability to respond to demand is needed to ensure timely follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42435275What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.