Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42435265›Full record

ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2026

Quantitative Analysis of Plasmid DNA Distribution and Transgene Expression Following Cell Squeezing.

Justin Sylvers, Joseph Krakowiecki, Yutong Wu, Fan Yuan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Justin SylversDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.
Joseph KrakowieckiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.
Yutong WuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.
Fan YuanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA. fyuan@duke.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0687-6607

Funding

Chemically Assisted Electrotransfer of DNAR35GM145362 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI FAN YUAN · 2022 to 2026
$2.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS 145362NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM145362
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMicrofluidic cell squeezing is a promising mechanoporation strategy that has been successfully applied to deliver various macromolecules, including proteins and nucleic acids. However, its success is limited when mechanoporation is used alone to facilitate gene delivery. The goal of the current study is to develop a gene delivery strategy that integrates electrotransfection and mechanoporation.

methodsWe designed and fabricated a microfluidic device for controlled cell squeezing. Mammalian cells were first electrotransfected with pDNA, followed by mechanical squeezing to promote nuclear entry of the delivered DNA. Intracellular pDNA transport and transgene expression were quantitatively evaluated in squeezed and un-squeezed cells.

resultsCell squeezing increased cellular uptake and nuclear accumulation of pDNA by more than eightfold compared with un-squeezed controls. Despite this substantial enhancement in DNA delivery, transgene mRNA levels remained unchanged, and protein production was consistently reduced relative to controls. The lack of increased transgene expression might be partially attributable to squeezing-induced chromatin condensation.

conclusionThese findings indicate that chromatin condensation limits transgene expression following mechanoporation. Pharmacological inhibition of chromatin condensation may therefore represent a promising strategy to improve the efficiency of mechanoporation-facilitated gene delivery.

Indexed as

Cell squeezingDNA nuclear entryEndocytosisMechanoporationMicrofluidicsNuclear deformation

Identifiers

PMID42435265
PMCPMC13480239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.