ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2026
Quantitative Analysis of Plasmid DNA Distribution and Transgene Expression Following Cell Squeezing.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mechanisms and Strategies for Enhancing DNA Nuclear Entry in Gene Delivery.Cellular and molecular bioengineering · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeMicrofluidic cell squeezing is a promising mechanoporation strategy that has been successfully applied to deliver various macromolecules, including proteins and nucleic acids. However, its success is limited when mechanoporation is used alone to facilitate gene delivery. The goal of the current study is to develop a gene delivery strategy that integrates electrotransfection and mechanoporation.
methodsWe designed and fabricated a microfluidic device for controlled cell squeezing. Mammalian cells were first electrotransfected with pDNA, followed by mechanical squeezing to promote nuclear entry of the delivered DNA. Intracellular pDNA transport and transgene expression were quantitatively evaluated in squeezed and un-squeezed cells.
resultsCell squeezing increased cellular uptake and nuclear accumulation of pDNA by more than eightfold compared with un-squeezed controls. Despite this substantial enhancement in DNA delivery, transgene mRNA levels remained unchanged, and protein production was consistently reduced relative to controls. The lack of increased transgene expression might be partially attributable to squeezing-induced chromatin condensation.
conclusionThese findings indicate that chromatin condensation limits transgene expression following mechanoporation. Pharmacological inhibition of chromatin condensation may therefore represent a promising strategy to improve the efficiency of mechanoporation-facilitated gene delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.