ArticleMagma (New York, N.Y.)2026
Optimal cardiac phase selection using motion-sensitive cine imaging improves T2w-STIR image quality in cardiac MRI.
Article in Magma (New York, N.Y.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveCardiac T2-weighted short-tau inversion recovery (T2w-STIR) is highly susceptible to myocardial motion, and acquisition at inappropriate cardiac phases can cause myocardial signal loss and inhomogeneity. This study investigated whether cardiac phase selection based on motion-sensitive (MoSe) cine imaging improves T2w-STIR image quality compared with conventional ECG-synchronized acquisition at the longest trigger delay corresponding to end-diastole. MATERIALS AND
methodsTwelve healthy volunteers underwent 1.5T cardiac MRI. MoSe cine imaging with ECG and peripheral pulse unit (PPU) synchronization was used to visually identify phases with minimal myocardial motion. Short-axis T2w-STIR images were acquired at Conv[ECG-l] (longest ECG trigger delay at end-diastole), MoSe[ECG-S] (MoSe-determined systolic phase with ECG), and MoSe[PPU-D] (MoSe-determined diastolic phase with PPU). Quantitative assessments were myocardium-to-spleen ratio (MSR) and inter- and intra-slice MSR coefficient of variation (CV). Overall image quality was scored on a 4-point scale.
resultsMoSe[PPU-D] yielded higher MSR and lower inter- and intra-slice CVs than Conv[ECG-l] (p < 0.05), and higher MSR and lower intra-slice CV than MoSe[ECG-S] (p < 0.05). Qualitative scores were higher for MoSe[PPU-D] than for Conv[ECG-l] and MoSe[ECG-S] (p < 0.05).
conclusionCardiac T2w-STIR images acquired at the MoSe-identified optimal diastolic phase with PPU synchronization provide superior image quality compared with conventional ECG-synchronized approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42435256What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.