ArticleEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2026
Frequency-decomposed EEG microstate analysis reveals altered cross-frequency coordination in adolescent major depressive disorder.
Article in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Adolescent major depressive disorder (MDD) involves alterations in large‑scale brain network dynamics. However, conventional EEG microstate studies typically rely on broadband signals and overlook frequency‑band specificity and cross‑frequency coordination. To address this gap, we collected resting‑state EEG data from 108 first‑episode, treatment‑naïve adolescent MDD patients and 96 healthy controls. We performed frequency‑decomposed microstate analysis (delta to gamma), computed pairwise adjusted mutual information (AMI) to assess band independence, and applied cross‑frequency coordination measures (co‑occurrence rate and effective transfer entropy) to broadband‑narrowband pairs. Discriminative performance was evaluated using machine learning with nested cross‑validation. Results showed that the eyes‑closed condition was more sensitive than eyes‑open, revealing widespread microstate abnormalities in the broadband, alpha, beta, and theta bands. AMI values between frequency bands were very low (maximum 0.0565 for broadband‑alpha), indicating that different bands carry largely independent information. Cross‑frequency coordination analyses revealed opposite alterations: broadband‑alpha coordination was reduced, whereas broadband‑delta coordination was enhanced. A fusion model using only the two best cross‑frequency coordination features achieved high discriminative performance (balanced accuracy = 0.835, AUC = 0.894), and these features did not correlate with clinical symptom severity. Together, our findings provide a frequency‑resolved, system‑level characterization of adolescent MDD and suggest that cross‑frequency coordination features may serve as candidate objective neurodynamic descriptors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42435240What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.