ArticleSkeletal radiology2026
Dual-input deep learning bone age assessment in late adolescence using hand and knee radiographs.
Article in Skeletal radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo develop and internally evaluate an age-assisted dual-input model for bone age assessment in late adolescence using paired hand-wrist and knee radiographs. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis single-center retrospective study included 547 adolescents aged 13-19 years with paired left hand-wrist and left knee radiographs (1094 images) acquired during routine clinical care. Data were split at the subject level into training, validation, and internal held-out test sets (70%/10%/20%; 382/55/110 subjects), keeping paired images from each subject in the same subset. A ShuffleNet v2-based model used hand and knee radiographs as visual inputs and incorporated chronological age and sex as auxiliary variables. The validation set was used for model selection, and final performance was evaluated on the internal held-out test set using mean absolute error, root mean square error, and intraclass correlation coefficient.
resultsThe final model achieved a mean absolute error of 3.77 months, root mean square error of 4.58 months, and intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.984, with 98.18% of predictions within 12 months of the reference standard. Internal ablation comparisons showed lower errors with paired hand-knee inputs and demographic variables than with single-site inputs.
conclusionIn this single-center retrospective cohort, the age-assisted dual-input framework showed promising internal performance for late-adolescent bone age assessment. Independent multicenter external validation is required before clinical deployment, forensic/disputed-age use, or legal decision-making. Knee radiographs should be used only when already available or medically justified, not as routine additional imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42435209What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.