ArticleMolecular diversity2026
Prediction and mechanistic insights into drug-induced reproductive toxicity through integrated machine learning, FAERS-based signal comparison, and network toxicology analyses.
Article in Molecular diversity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Drug-induced reproductive toxicity is a critical concern in drug safety evaluation, whereas conventional assessment methods are often constrained by high costs and long experimental cycles. In this study, a machine learning-based predictive model for reproductive toxicity was developed and integrated with data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), network toxicology analysis, molecular docking, and molecular dynamics simulation to systematically evaluate the post-marketing reproductive toxicity risk of drugs and explore their potential mechanisms. Among the evaluated machine learning algorithms, LightGBM demonstrated the best overall performance, achieving an F1-score of 0.854, a ROC-AUC of 0.933, a PR-AUC of 0.931, and an MCC of 0.705 on the independent test set, with robust generalization confirmed by ten-fold cross-validation. Among drugs approved between 2015 and 2024, 72 were predicted to have a high risk of reproductive toxicity. FAERS-based signal comparison showed that 55 of these drugs (76.39%) were associated with reproductive toxicity-related adverse event reports, indicating consistency between model predictions and FAERS-reported reproductive toxicity-related adverse events. Network toxicology analysis identified 12 key targets, including ESR1, IGF1, and AKT1, that may be involved in reproductive toxicity. Molecular docking showed that drugs with high predicted reproductive toxicity risk could bind effectively to multiple toxicity-related targets, while molecular dynamics simulations confirmed stable interactions between selected drugs and ESR1, mainly through hydrogen-bonding and hydrophobic interactions. Favorable binding free energies further supported their potential multi-target effects. Overall, this integrated strategy combining predictive modeling with FAERS-based signal comparison provides a useful framework for drug safety evaluation and mechanistic investigation of reproductive toxicity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42435192What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.