ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2026
ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in older adults: echocardiographic characterization and outcomes in contemporary practice : STEMI in older patients.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Evidence on cardiac remodeling, left ventricular (LV) function recovery, medication use and outcomes in older ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients is limited. We examined these aspects at baseline and evolution one year post-infarct in patients aged ≥ 80 versus < 80.STEMI registry data were retrospectively analyzed. The older subgroup included patients aged ≥ 80 years at index hospitalization. Echocardiography was performed at baseline and one year after STEMI. LV remodeling was defined as > 20% relative increase in the LV end-diastolic volume. One-year cardiovascular outcomes and five-year all-cause mortality are reported.Study included 2178 patients; 132 (6.1%) were aged ≥ 80. Older patients had worse baseline LV ejection fraction (47.2 ± 9.6% versus 49.8 ± 8.2%; p < 0.001) and experienced more adverse LV remodeling (29% versus 19%; p = 0.024). Nevertheless, LV function improved similarly in both groups. Beta-blocker and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor use was lower (86.4% versus 94.2%; p < 0.001 and 90.2% versus 96.5%; p < 0.001, respectively) but diuretic prescription higher (18.2% versus 8.1%; p < 0.001) in older patients. One year post-infarct beta-blocker and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor use decreased and was similar in both groups, but older patients continued to receive more diuretics and suffered higher heart failure hospitalization rates (7.0% versus 2.6%; p = 0.006). Five-year mortality was 25.8% in older versus 4.3% in younger patients (log-rank χ2 133.2; p < 0.001).Older patients experienced more adverse LV remodeling, received less beta-blockers and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors but more diuretics at discharge and one year, compared to younger patients. Nevertheless, LV function recovered similarly in both groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42435156What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.