ArticleCognitive processing2026
Context-specific allocation of attentional control in anxiety and uncontrollability.
Article in Cognitive processing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Volatile, unpredictable environments often evoke experiences of anxiety and uncontrollability. Previous research has shown that both high trait anxiety and a perceived lack of control can negatively affect the efficiency of attentional control. In the present research, we examined a novel hypothesis: that anxiety and uncontrollability impact the learning of control allocation in a context-dependent way. We assumed that highly anxious individuals or those who experience uncontrollability would exhibit reduced attentional control because incidental learning from contextual cues is altered. In Experiment 1, we investigated how dispositional differences in anxiety relate to incidental learning from the task context, indexed by the context-specific proportion congruency (CSPC) effect. Participants scoring high (vs. low) in trait anxiety did not differ in the magnitude of the CSPC effect during the initial learning phase. However, once the association was acquired, anxious participants showed difficulties in flexibly modifying it based on new contextual information indicating that the association between proportion congruency and the context was reversed. In Experiment 2, we examined the effect of induced uncontrollability on subsequent incidental learning from contextual cues. We observed an absence of the CSPC effect during the learning phase for participants who had previously been exposed to uncontrollability. We discuss the implications of these findings for theories concerning how anxiety and a lack of control influence flexible learning about when to allocate more or less attentional control based on contextual cues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42435140What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.