Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42435138›Full record

ArticleCognitive processing2026

Shaping attitudes toward body-related cues via evaluative conditioning: investigating the roles of social comparison and self-esteem.

Patrycja Uram, Robert Balas

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive processing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Patrycja UramInstitute of Psychology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland. patrycja.uram@sd.psych.pan.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9927-2916
Robert BalasInstitute of Psychology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1906-216X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evaluative conditioning (EC) is a mechanism through which attitudes toward neutral stimuli can be shaped by pairing them with positive or negative cues. Despite growing evidence for its role in attitude formation, little is known about whether EC can effectively modify body-related evaluations and how individual dispositions may moderate these effects. The present study examined whether neutral geometric figures (CS) would become more positive in valence and liking when paired with body images differing in weight status (average-weight vs. obese). A total of N = 146 participants completed baseline ratings of neutral CS, underwent an EC task pairing CS with average-weight or obese body images, and provided post-conditioning evaluations along with measures of self-esteem and body, eating and exercise-related social comparison (BEECOM). Results showed that CS paired with average-weight bodies increased significantly in both valence and liking, whereas obese-paired CS showed no significant change. Critically, social comparison tendency moderated overall responsiveness to conditioning: participants low in BEECOM showed significant increases in liking across conditions, whereas high-BEECOM participants showed no change. Neither variable moderated the specific differential conditioning effect between pairing conditions. Self-esteem did not moderate conditioning effects. Exploratory analyses revealed no evidence that conditioning altered perceptual judgments of stimulus size. Findings highlight the importance of individual differences in social comparison as determinants of conditioning responsiveness in the body image domain.

Indexed as

Body imageEvaluative conditioningModerationSelf-esteemSocial comparison

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.