ArticleJournal of autism and developmental disorders2026
Unmasking: A Mixed-Methods Study of Autistic College Students' Efforts to Stop Masking/Camouflaging.
Article in Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reclaiming selfhood: towards a conceptualisation of the autistic unmasking process.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
purposeAutistic individuals often mask/camouflage to conceal their autistic traits, but this practice is stressful and damaging to mental health. Unmasking, a newly identified phenomenon, is the deliberate effort to stop masking and reclaim a more authentic self-presentation. This study is the first to examine autistic people's experiences with unmasking and its mental health implications.
methodsInterviews (n = 14) and surveys (n = 214) examined autistic college students' understanding of unmasking, experiences and motivations, and impacts on mental health.
resultsThe majority of participants in both samples had heard of unmasking, and half had tried it. Interviewees showed substantial variation in ability and willingness to unmask. Unmasking was difficult-to-impossible when masking was highly ingrained, as deconstructing masking repertoires and rediscovering their "true selves" was challenging. Unmasking relieved stress from masking and increased authenticity, but also created worries that revealing a more autistic self-presentation would garner social backlash, unless supported by friends or other unmaskers. Survey respondents' unmasking frequency was overall low, but varied across social contexts. Unmasking difficulty was associated with heightened anxiety, whereas unmasking with family predicted decreased anxiety and depression. Other unmasking variables were less robust predictors, but suggest that unmasking is beneficial amongst those who try it.
conclusionWe need further research into unmasking, especially its trajectories and mental health impacts. In comparison to masking, unmasking may be a more collectively beneficial practice. Its drawbacks are all rooted in external stigma, suggesting that increasing autism acceptance is key to supporting autistic individuals' unmasking and long-term mental well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42435102What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.