SynthesisSports medicine - open2026
Moderating Effects of Individual Characteristics and the Target Lower Limb Muscle Group on Flexibility Adaptations to Chronic Static Stretching in Healthy Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Synthesis in Sports medicine - open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundStatic stretching is widely accessible across the lifespan and commonly prescribed to improve flexibility. However, whether flexibility improvements following chronic static stretching are moderated by participant characteristics or the targeted muscle group in lower-limb remains uncertain.
objectivesWe primarily aimed to determine whether the effects of chronic static stretching on flexibility are moderated by age, sex, training status, baseline flexibility, and muscle group.
methodsWe searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus for randomized controlled trials published before June 2025 that examined the chronic effects of static stretching on lower limb flexibility outcomes (compared with non-stretching or passive control conditions) in healthy populations. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model, with effect sizes expressed as standardized mean differences corrected for small-sample bias (Hedges' g). Subgroup analyses were conducted to examine the potential moderation by age (children and adolescents vs young vs middle-aged vs older adults), sex (male vs female), training status (athlete/trained vs recreationally active vs sedentary), baseline flexibility (with tightness vs without tightness and not reported), and muscle group (knee flexors vs knee extensors vs ankle plantar flexors). Methodological quality was assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale, and potential small-study effects were evaluated using Egger's regression test and trim-and-fill analysis.
resultsSeventy-nine studies (n = 3287) were included in the analysis. Chronic static stretching produced a moderate improvement in flexibility (Hedges' g = 0.851, 95% confidence interval 0.710 to 0.991; SE = 0.0718; Z = 11.845; p < 0.001), with substantial heterogeneity (τ
conclusionsChronic static stretching yielded significant, moderate improvements in lower-limb flexibility; however, substantial heterogeneity and potential small-study effects were observed. These effects did not appear to be meaningfully moderated by age, sex, baseline flexibility, training status, or target muscle group. Overall, chronic static stretching may improve lower-limb flexibility across diverse healthy individuals and target muscle groups, although the results should be interpreted cautiously given the heterogeneity, potential small-study effects, and methodological variability among the included studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.