ArticleExperimental brain research2026
Characteristic differences in somatosensory ERP components in Go/No-go paradigm between adolescents and adults.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated developmental differences in motor execution and inhibition by comparing somatosensory event-related potentials (ERPs) between adolescents and young adults. Thirty-seven adolescents (14.7 ± 0.2 years) and thirty-seven adults (21.1 ± 1.4 years) performed a somatosensory Go/No-go task while ERPs were recorded at Fz, Cz, and Pz electrodes. We analyzed the latency and amplitude of N2, additional negativity (AN), and P3 components together with behavioral indices including reaction time (RT), RT variability, omission errors, and commission errors, and also examined the scalp distribution of the P3 amplitude. Adolescents showed significantly higher commission error rates than adults, whereas other behavioral indices were comparable. ERP analyses revealed enhanced AN amplitude at Fz and shorter N2 latency at Fz, Cz, and Pz only in adolescents compared with adults. Moreover, No-go-P3 in adolescents was more parietally distributed, whereas adults exhibited a more anterior distribution, suggesting greater prefrontal involvement in adults. These findings suggest that although the speed of sensory-cognitive processing reaches an adult-like level by adolescence, inhibitory control and its underlying neural mechanisms continue to mature during this period. While adolescents exhibit ERP-behavior relationships comparable with those of adults, they may rely on broader and less specialized neural networks, particularly for frontal inhibitory control. Overall, the present results highlight adolescence as a key transitional stage in the development of cognitive control, with important implications for understanding age-related changes in sensorimotor processing and inhibitory functions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42435051What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.