Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42434920›Full record

ReviewDiagnostic cytopathology2026

Minimally Invasive Sampling Techniques for Pancreatic and Pulmonary Nodules: A Review of the Evolution of Guidance and Sampling Methods.

Lester J Layfield, Barbara Centeno

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostic cytopathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lester J LayfieldDepartment of Pathology and Anatomical Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1344-6506
Barbara CentenoDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tissue biopsy is frequently required in the workup of newly discovered nodules and masses detected by palpation, visual inspection, or imaging. Biopsy techniques include open surgical biopsy, core needle biopsy, fine-needle biopsy (FNB), fine-needle aspiration (FNA), and cryobiopsy. The last four techniques are utilized because of their minimally invasive nature and low patient morbidity. While FNA and FNB are often utilized at a number of body sites, cryobiopsy is becoming the dominant method for sampling of lung nodules. In this review, the authors investigate the utility, advantages, disadvantages, and diagnostic accuracy of minimally invasive biopsy techniques for lesions of the pancreas and lung.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsPancreatic NeoplasmsBiopsy, Fine-NeedleHumansPancreasaccuracycore biopsycryobiopsyfine‐needle aspirationfine‐needle biopsylungpancreas

Identifiers

PMID42434920
PMCPMC13428481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.