ArticlePhysical therapy2026
Building pain resilience in LGBTQIA+ individuals.
Article in Physical therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, asexual, and individuals with other related experiences or identities (LGBTQIA+) experience chronic pain and disability at twice the rate as their cisgender, endosex, and heterosexual counterparts. These disparities are shaped by intersecting social, structural, and historical factors, including minority stress, health care discrimination, and barriers to affirming care. While contextualized approaches to pain management have been recommended to address the unique lived experiences of LGBTQIA+ individuals, prevailing pain models largely remain grounded in deficit-oriented frameworks that emphasize vulnerability, maladaptive cognitions, and individual pathology. Such approaches risk obscuring the broader social determinants of health that shape pain experiences and may inadvertently reproduce dynamics of stigma and medical mistrust. This perspective argues for a conceptual shift toward an affirmative, resilience-based approach to chronic pain management for LGBTQIA+ individuals. Drawing on evidence from LGBTQIA+ affirming care, trauma-informed practice, and resilience-based approaches, this perspective proposes a framework that integrates recognition of social and structural inequities with strengths-based principles that emphasize adaptive coping, psychological flexibility, identity affirmation, and community connection. It outlines how physical therapists are uniquely positioned to operationalize this approach by fostering psychological safety, supporting meaningful movement and values-based engagement, and addressing contextual barriers to care. By moving beyond vulnerability-focused models and centering resilience as a dynamic, contextually situated process, this perspective offers a pathway for physical therapists to promote equity, empowerment, and more effective pain care for LGBTQIA+ individuals. Prevailing pain management models for LGBTQIA+ individuals are largely deficit-oriented, often overlooking minority stress, structural inequities, and the historical pathologization of LGBTQIA+ identities. Resilience-based, LGBTQIA+-affirming approaches integrate strengths, adaptive coping, and community resources while explicitly acknowledging social determinants of health and previous trauma. This perspective calls for a conceptual and practice-level shift in physical therapy, positioning affirming, resilience-informed pain care as essential to advancing equity and improving outcomes for LGBTQIA+ communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.