ArticleThe ISME journal2026
Characterizing the ecological niche of insertion sequences within prokaryotic genomes.
Article in The ISME journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Ecological theory sheds light on plasmid diversity and dynamics.PLoS biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Insertion sequences (ISs) are widespread prokaryotic transposable elements, often regarded as genomic parasites that primarily cause deleterious mutations. However, they can also promote adaptive changes. These antagonistic properties make their overall impact on prokaryotic evolution difficult to grasp. Here, we address this challenge by leveraging the framework of transposon ecology to analyze IS occurrences across and within 30 499 prokaryotic genomes. Combining phylogenomics with multi-scale genomic analysis, quantitative ecology, and mathematical modeling, we provide evidence that although genomes generally provide sufficient resources for IS coexistence, universal mechanisms shape their occurrence and chromosomal distribution across genomes. These include (i) the preferential localization of ISs within highly variable and GC-heterogeneous chromosomal regions of genomic plasticity, which act as the primary reservoir of IS niches; (ii) a linear scaling between IS abundance and niche size, with an average of $5.4$ additional accessible insertion sites per IS; (iii) a dependence of IS occurrence on the presence of other ISs, suggesting a form of group behavior; (iv) the accumulation of AT-rich sequences in both coding and noncoding regions up to 100 kb around ISs, indicative of ecological isolation; and (v) the spatial partitioning of mobile genetic elements around ISs, reminiscent of ecological niche differentiation. Besides these general principles, we also uncover niche specificities associated with particular IS families, hinting at regulatory mechanisms that modulate IS activity. Altogether, this comprehensive transposon ecology approach offers new insights and avenues for understanding IS-host interactions and genome evolution, moving beyond traditional host-centric perspectives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.