ReviewAnnals of translational medicine2026
Chronic eczematous eruptions of aging: a clinical practice review.
Review in Annals of translational medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chronic eczematous skin disorders that first appear in later life are poorly characterized, partly because existing terminology is inconsistent and often conflates morphologic descriptors with specific diagnoses. This review introduces chronic eczematous eruptions of aging (CEEsA) as an umbrella term, summarizes current knowledge on its epidemiology, etiologies, and clinical presentation, outlines best practices in management, and highlights gaps requiring further investigation. CEEsA frequently present as ill defined, intensely pruritic eruptions on the trunk and extensor limbs, are often refractory to standard topical therapies, and may be precipitated by calcium channel blockers or thiazide diuretics. A structured diagnostic algorithm-incorporating exclusion of mimickers (e.g., tinea pedis-linked auto-eczematization, scabies, contact dermatitis, cutaneous T-cell lymphoma), lesional biopsy, patch testing, and strategic drug withdrawal-is essential before escalating to systemic therapy. This approach helps avoid unnecessary treatment or other etiologies with different management. Although traditional broad spectrum immunosuppressants carry age related safety concerns, emerging targeted agents that dampen type 2 cytokine signaling (dupilumab, tralokinumab) or Janus kinase pathways (upadacitinib) show promising efficacy and tolerability in small case series of CEEsA, including idiopathic forms. Recognizing CEEsA as a distinct clinical construct should streamline nomenclature, sensitize clinicians to reversible drug triggers, and catalyze research into pathophysiology-specific, age appropriate treatments for this under studied geriatric dermatology domain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.