Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42434772›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in health services2026

Evaluating the implementation of a mental health joint response with young people and families: protocol for the care responders study, a realist and health economic evaluation.

Sarah Parry, Zarah Eve, Heather Brown, Fiona Lobban, Prathiba Chitsabesan, Debbie Robinson, Karina Lovell, Adele Terry, Kathryn Harper, Kelly Brodie and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in health services, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sarah ParryFaculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Zarah EvePennine Care NHS Foundation Trust, 225 Old Street, Ashton-under-Lyne, Lancashire, United Kingdom.
Heather BrownFaculty of Health and Medicine, Division of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom.
Fiona LobbanFaculty of Health and Medicine, Division of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom.
Prathiba ChitsabesanPennine Care NHS Foundation Trust, 225 Old Street, Ashton-under-Lyne, Lancashire, United Kingdom.
Debbie RobinsonGreater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Karina LovellPennine Care NHS Foundation Trust, 225 Old Street, Ashton-under-Lyne, Lancashire, United Kingdom.
Adele TerryPennine Care NHS Foundation Trust, 225 Old Street, Ashton-under-Lyne, Lancashire, United Kingdom.
Kathryn HarperPennine Care NHS Foundation Trust, 225 Old Street, Ashton-under-Lyne, Lancashire, United Kingdom.
Kelly BrodiePennine Care NHS Foundation Trust, 225 Old Street, Ashton-under-Lyne, Lancashire, United Kingdom.
Geoff WongNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Medical Sciences Division, The University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Mental health crises among children and young people are increasing in frequency and complexity, yet emergency responses often lack appropriate tailoring for young people and responders cite a need for further workforce training and support. This study will integrate immersive theatre, co-production methods, health economic analysis, research data, and a realist synthesis to develop a holistic programme theory informing joint responses to crisis care for children and young people. It will incorporate novel triangulation across these methods and, where appropriate, draw on the recently published Realist Economic Evaluation Methods(REEMS) guidance. Methods: This study aims to evaluate a novel intervention involving a joint response by police officers and mental health practitioners. A realist and health economic evaluation design will be employed, incorporating multiple data collection methods. Participants will include children and young people aged 5-18, their families, carers, and practitioners. Data will be collected through surveys, interviews, and routine service records, with recruitment via five distinct pathways including direct response and online participation. Results: The evaluation will explore how, why, and for whom the joint response car works, identifying mechanisms and contextual factors that influence outcomes. A cost-consequence analysis will assess the financial implications of the intervention compared to usual care. Discussion: Findings will inform best practice guidance for emergency mental health care and support national implementation of joint response models. The study will also contribute to understanding service integration and stakeholder engagement in crisis care.

Indexed as

childrenco-responsecrisisemergency respondermental healthprotocolyoung people

Identifiers

PMID42434772
PMCPMC13350323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.