SynthesisFrontiers in health services2026
The mental health and wellbeing outcomes and mechanisms of change in arts inclusive programs for children aged 6-12: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in health services, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Arts-based programs have re-emerged as a focus of population mental health policy, with the World Health Organisation Healing Arts initiative and social prescribing programs across the UK, Australia, USA, and Canada signaling growing interest in scalable, accessible approaches to mental health prevention. With this growing trend there is an opportunity for seeking complementary scalable approaches implemented during childhood to prevent mental-ill health. Objective: The aim of this study was to provide a broad overview of the nature of the relationships between participation in arts programs and mental health and wellbeing outcomes during middle childhood, with a specific emphasis on the mechanisms that may underlie this relationship. This review also aimed to identify program characteristics and the context in which this relationship exists. Methods: This systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines with a focus on studies examining the relationships between arts participation and mental health and wellbeing outcomes among children in the general population during the middle childhood years (6 to 12 years). Results: A total of 34 studies were included, made up of primarily quantitative studies. The evidence base reviewed suggests therapeutic approaches in non-clinical settings led by specialists over shorter periods of implementation (typically 4-10 weeks) shows preliminary signs of promise. Recreational programs showed inconsistent effects across outcome domains: some studies reported benefits to wellbeing and stress, while others reported no effect on internalising or externalising symptoms, with no consistent pattern across program features. Psychological and biological constructs were the most commonly identified mechanisms of change. The certainty of evidence across all mental health outcomes was rated as low or very low. Conclusion: This first systematic review of arts-inclusive programs in middle childhood points to preliminary signs of promise, particularly for therapeutic approaches in non-clinical settings, although the certainty of evidence is low. Future research should focus on conducting high quality studies in school contexts with a focus on pedagogical design and facilitator expertise. This would address cost effectiveness for scaling at the general population level for prevention. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024581364.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.