ArticleEarth, planets, and space : EPS2026
Preliminary tide gauge evidence for equilibrium and non-equilibrium pole tide variability after the 2015 Chandler Wobble amplitude reduction.
Article in Earth, planets, and space : EPS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The pole tide has been defined as the oceanic response to polar motion, with a component due to the Chandler Wobble (CW), at a period near 14 months. The magnitude of the CW was greatly reduced after about 2015, and a corresponding global attenuation of the ocean pole tide amplitude is expected. We analyzed global tide gauge measurements using empirical orthogonal functions (EOF) methods to separate temporal and spatial patterns of regional pole tide signals. Our results show that tide gauge arrays in Japan and along the east coast of North America exhibit 14-month pole tide signals whose temporal variability is broadly consistent with the CW amplitude reduction after 2015. At stations in both regions, EOF-based mean pole tide amplitudes since 1980 fall in the range of approximately 0.5-1 cm, representing a more coherent signal than direct spectral estimates from individual stations. These amplitudes exceed the expected equilibrium response (less than 0.5 cm), suggesting that they reflect a mixture of equilibrium and moderate non-equilibrium contributions. Tide gauges in the North Sea and Baltic Sea show no detectable amplitude decrease after ~ 2015, consistent with previous studies documenting strong non-equilibrium pole tide variability in these regions. Together with the partial agreement with equilibrium expectations in Japan and along the North American east coast, these results suggest that regional pole tide signals likely reflect a combination of equilibrium response and additional forcing, potentially including long-period atmospheric variability. Graphical abstract: Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40623-026-02461-4.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.