Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42434762›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in insect science2026

Soil nutrition and foliar intervention in

Muhammad Wajid Javed, Waseem Akram, Muhammad Umair Gulzar, Ammara Riaz, Muhammad Sagheer, Asad Aslam, Ayman El Sabagh, Mohammed Antar

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in insect science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Muhammad Wajid JavedDepartment of Entomology, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Waseem AkramDepartment of Entomology, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Muhammad Umair GulzarDepartment of Entomology and Food Science, University of Layyah, Layyah, Pakistan.
Ammara RiazDepartment of Life Sciences, Khwaja Fareed University of Engineering and Information Technology, Rahimyar Khan, Pakistan.
Muhammad SagheerDepartment of Entomology, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Asad AslamEntomological Research Substation, Multan, Pakistan.
Ayman El SabaghFaculty of Agriculture, Siirt Universitesi, Siirt, Türkiye.
Mohammed AntarAgronomist and Independent Researcher, Windsor, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Green peach aphid ( Methods: Therefore, effectiveness of different foliar interventions based on salicylic acid-SA and citric acid-CA at 0, 0.5, and 1 mM, and soil nutrition through herbivore-deterrence (silicon-Si and ammonium sulphate-Ams at 25 and 50 kg ha Results: In foliar intervention treatments, 1 mM SA was the most effective treatment followed by 0.5 mM SA and 1 mM CA in reducing aphid biological parameters (10.21 to 71.5%), while in herbivore-deterrence and soil amendments, 50 kg Si (23.5-66.04%) and ES+BS (21.5-42.9%) performed better, respectively. Conclusion: These results are important in sustainable management of aphids, improving canola yield, and ensuring global food security. However, deciphering the underlying mechanism of pest resistance in canola should be an important goal of future research.

Indexed as

antibiosiscompostpest resistancesalicylic acidsilicon

Identifiers

PMID42434762
PMCPMC13350061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.