Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42434747›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2026

Diagnostic accuracy of imaging modalities for primary small-bowel tumors: a systematic review and diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis.

Qi Xia, Qinghai Li, Chao Ding, Jun Wang

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Qi XiaDepartment of General Surgery II, The First People's Hospital of Daishan County, Daishan, Zhejiang, China.
Qinghai LiDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Chao DingDepartment of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Jun WangDepartment of Gastroenterology Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Primary small-bowel tumors are uncommon and frequently present with non-specific symptoms. Timely and accurate diagnosis relies on a range of radiologic and endoscopy-based modalities, yet their comparative diagnostic performance remains uncertain. Methods: We performed a systematic review and diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis. PubMed, Embase, CNKI, and Wanfang databases were searched from inception to August 31, 2025, and the reference lists of included studies and relevant reviews were hand-searched. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias using the QUADAS-2 tool. To avoid unit-of-analysis errors, the primary analysis used a de-duplicated dataset with one representative arm per study cohort according to a prespecified hierarchy: the primary or original/consensus reading reported by the source article, then the arm with the largest analyzable 2×2 denominator, and finally the estimate closest to the within-study median diagnostic odds ratio if ties remained. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were estimated using hierarchical bivariate random-effects models, while alternative arms were retained for sensitivity analyses. Results: Twenty-one studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in the quantitative synthesis. The overall pooled sensitivity was 0.91 (95% CI: 0.87-0.93) and specificity was 0.88 (95% CI: 0.78-0.94), with an area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.93-0.97). Between-study heterogeneity was substantial. In modality-stratified analyses, dedicated enterography techniques (magnetic resonance enterography and computed tomography enterography) demonstrated the highest comprehensive diagnostic accuracy, outperforming conventional contrast-enhanced CT and functional imaging. Conclusions: Contemporary imaging modalities exhibit high overall diagnostic performance for primary small-bowel tumors. Enterography-based cross-sectional imaging yielded the most favorable point estimates, although confidence intervals overlapped with those of conventional CT. These findings support CTE and MRE as strong diagnostic options within a multimodality pathway rather than proving clear statistical superiority. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD420251144585.

Indexed as

diagnostic imagingdiagnostic test accuracyenterographymeta-analysissmall bowel neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID42434747
PMCPMC13349763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.