SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2026
Optimal treatment strategies for unresectable stage III
Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The PACIFIC regimen (consolidation durvalumab following chemoradiotherapy) is the standard of care for unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). With the publication of data from the phase III LAURA trial and the emergence of real-world evidence regarding sequential toxicity, concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by sequential targeted therapy with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is recommended for patients with EGFR mutations. However, the optimal combination regimen remains to be determined. Methods: We systematically searched the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and high-quality retrospective studies comparing various therapeutic strategies for unresectable stage III EGFR-mutated NSCLC. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), while secondary endpoints included the objective response rate (ORR) and safety profiles. A network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed using a Bayesian random-effects model. Hazard ratios (HRs), odds ratios (ORs), and their corresponding 95% credible intervals (CrIs) were calculated. Results: A total of 12 studies involving 1,529 patients were analyzed to compare six therapeutic strategies: consolidation durvalumab following chemoradiotherapy (CRT+Durva), CRT alone, consolidation EGFR-TKIs after CRT (CRT+EGFR-TKI), EGFR-TKI monotherapy, EGFR-TKI in combination with chemotherapy (EGFR-TKI+Chemo), and EGFR-TKI integrated with radiotherapy (EGFR-TKI+RT) via induction, concurrent, or consolidation sequencing. NMA revealed that CRT+EGFR-TKI was the only strategy to demonstrate a statistically significant improvement in OS compared to CRT alone (HR = 0.63, 95% CrI: 0.41-0.94), while also achieving the highest ORR. EGFR-TKI+RT (chemotherapy-free regimen) ranked first for PFS (HR = 0.14, 95% CrI: 0.06-0.33) and exhibited a favorable safety profile, associated with the lowest risk of severe radiation pneumonitis (RP). Notably, CRT+Durva failed to yield a survival benefit (PFS: HR = 0.75; OS: HR = 0.82) and was characterized by higher toxicity. An RCT-only sensitivity analysis demonstrated consistent PFS benefits and a comparable OS trend (HR = 0.68, 95% CrI: 0.33-1.4), validating the integration of real-world data to maintain adequate statistical power. Conclusions: For unresectable stage III EGFR-mutated NSCLC, CRT+EGFR-TKI represents the optimal strategy for extending OS. Conversely, the EGFR-TKI+RT (chemotherapy-free regimen) approach provides a superior balance between prolonged PFS and clinical tolerability. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD420261285935.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.