Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42434736›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026

Solution for the hot spots in adaptive radiotherapy planning for cervical cancer: a case report and review of literature.

Peng Jiang, Xiang Wang, Shubao Cui, Chengyu Ren, Zilu Wang, Yongchun Zhang, Xiaoqian Wu

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Peng JiangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Xiang WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Shubao CuiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Chengyu RenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Zilu WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Yongchun ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Xiaoqian WuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Ethos system (version 2.0, Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) is an online adaptive radiotherapy (ART) platform that can automatically replan based on the daily anatomical structure and achieve precise dose delivery. However, the highly automated online ART workflow may sometimes lead to excessive dose accumulation within the target in adaptive plan. This article reports a cervical cancer case in which hot spots appeared in the adaptive plan during adaptive treatment session. In these adaptive plans with hot spots, the edge of target was close to the multi-leaf collimator (MLC) boundary, resulting in limited leaf movement and reduced modulation flexibility. Therefore, we propose an improved online ART workflow to correct the deviation of the target, which effectively reduced the risk of hot spots in adaptive plan. This article discusses the problem occurrence, clinical response strategies and improved ART workflow, aiming to provide reference for improving the quality of adaptive plan and safety and stability of ART.

Indexed as

cervical cancerEthoshot spotsonline adaptive radiotherapytreatment planning

Identifiers

PMID42434736
PMCPMC13351529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.