Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42434725›Full record

ArticleMaterials today. Bio2026

Spinal cord tissueoid transplantation combined with tail nerve electrical stimulation promotes the voluntary movement of paralyzed hindlimbs in rats with transected spinal cord injury.

Bi-Qin Lai, Chuang-Ran Wu, Shang-Bin Yang, Jing Xu, Yue Yang, Rong-Jie Wu, Hai-Yang Yu, Zhen Chen, Rui Liu, Ying Ding and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials today. Bio, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Bi-Qin LaiCenter for Stem Cell Biology and Tissue Engineering, Key Laboratory for Stem Cells and Tissue Engineering Ministry of Education, Department of Histoembryology and Cell Biology, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Chuang-Ran WuDepartment of Orthopedics, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510100, China.
Shang-Bin YangCenter for Stem Cell Biology and Tissue Engineering, Key Laboratory for Stem Cells and Tissue Engineering Ministry of Education, Department of Histoembryology and Cell Biology, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Jing XuCenter for Stem Cell Biology and Tissue Engineering, Key Laboratory for Stem Cells and Tissue Engineering Ministry of Education, Department of Histoembryology and Cell Biology, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Yue YangCenter for Stem Cell Biology and Tissue Engineering, Key Laboratory for Stem Cells and Tissue Engineering Ministry of Education, Department of Histoembryology and Cell Biology, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Rong-Jie WuDepartment of Orthopedics, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510100, China.
Hai-Yang YuDepartment of Orthopedics, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510100, China.
Zhen ChenCenter for Stem Cell Biology and Tissue Engineering, Key Laboratory for Stem Cells and Tissue Engineering Ministry of Education, Department of Histoembryology and Cell Biology, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Rui LiuCenter for Stem Cell Biology and Tissue Engineering, Key Laboratory for Stem Cells and Tissue Engineering Ministry of Education, Department of Histoembryology and Cell Biology, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Ying DingCenter for Stem Cell Biology and Tissue Engineering, Key Laboratory for Stem Cells and Tissue Engineering Ministry of Education, Department of Histoembryology and Cell Biology, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Ge LiMedical Research Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510100, China.
Xiang ZengCenter for Stem Cell Biology and Tissue Engineering, Key Laboratory for Stem Cells and Tissue Engineering Ministry of Education, Department of Histoembryology and Cell Biology, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Yuan-Huan MaCenter for Stem Cell Biology and Tissue Engineering, Key Laboratory for Stem Cells and Tissue Engineering Ministry of Education, Department of Histoembryology and Cell Biology, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Shan-Shan MaGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Disease, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Qiao-Ying HuangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Disease, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Ya-Qiong WangCenter for Stem Cell Biology and Tissue Engineering, Key Laboratory for Stem Cells and Tissue Engineering Ministry of Education, Department of Histoembryology and Cell Biology, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Ling ZhangDepartment of Geriatrics, Rehabilitation Medicine Department, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Zheng-Hong ChenDepartment of Geriatrics, Rehabilitation Medicine Department, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Yi-Nan GuoCenter for Stem Cell Biology and Tissue Engineering, Key Laboratory for Stem Cells and Tissue Engineering Ministry of Education, Department of Histoembryology and Cell Biology, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Yuan-Feng ChenDepartment of Orthopedics, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510100, China.
Jia-Feng FangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510630, China.
Qiu-Jian ZhengDepartment of Orthopedics, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510100, China.
Yuan-Shan ZengCenter for Stem Cell Biology and Tissue Engineering, Key Laboratory for Stem Cells and Tissue Engineering Ministry of Education, Department of Histoembryology and Cell Biology, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recovery of voluntary movement after complete spinal cord injury (SCI) remains a formidable clinical challenge, as it necessitates both the reconstruction of disrupted spinal cord neural pathways and the restoration of the excitatory/inhibitory balance in sensorimotor neural circuits. To tackle this dual challenge, we transplanted a biomimetic spinal cord tissueoid (SCToid) into the injury cavity to structurally reestablish neural pathways, while concurrently applying tail nerve electrical stimulation (TNES) to functionally reactivate silent sensorimotor neural circuits. The results showed that combined SCToid transplantation and TNES promoted the regeneration of corticospinal tract and sensory afferent axons, which formed functional synapses with SCToid neurons. Moreover, monosynaptic tracer assays revealed direct innervation of lumbar spinal cord central pattern generator (CPG) interneurons by SCToid neurons; some CPG interneurons and sensory afferent axons also exhibited synaptic connectivity with motor neurons. Compared with the control group, transplantation of SCToids combined with TNES increased the ratio of excitatory/inhibitory synaptic terminals on the soma surfaces of CPG interneurons and motor neurons toward the pattern observed in normal spinal cords. This change ultimately enhanced the excitability of sensorimotor neural circuits and restored weight-bearing hindlimb walking. Collectively, these findings establish that reconstructing neural pathways and restoring the excitatory/inhibitory balance within CPG-regulated sensorimotor neural circuits are both necessary and sufficient to enable voluntary movement recovery. This synergistic mechanism establishes a robust theoretical framework for integrating biological and physical therapeutic strategies in SCI treatment, with specific implications for the combined application of transplantable engineered organoids and neurostimulation-based rehabilitation approaches.

Indexed as

Central pattern generatorSensorimotor neural circuitSpinal cord tissueoidTail nerve electrical stimulationTransected spinal cord injuryVoluntary motor function recovery

Identifiers

PMID42434725
PMCPMC13351160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.