ReviewFrontiers in ophthalmology2026
A concise overview of using the P300 component of the event-related potential for objective estimation of visual acuity.
Review in Frontiers in ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Visual acuity (VA) assessment traditionally relies on patient cooperation, which can be unreliable in pediatric cases, cognitive impairment, or suspected malingering. While the visual evoked potential (VEP) provides an objective alternative, it primarily reflects the integrity of the early visual pathways and may overestimate VA in conditions like amblyopia. This concise review explores the P300 event-related potential as a promising cognitively-driven tool for objective VA estimation. A literature search was conducted to identify studies utilizing the P300-a marker of high-level cognitive processing and conscious perception-for VA estimation. Additional literature was included to provide a broader context. Unlike the VEP, which depends on physical stimulus characteristics, the P300 is elicited during conscious stimulus categorization, typically using an oddball paradigm. Therefore, P300-based VA estimation can utilize standard clinical optotypes, such as Landolt Cs, allowing for a more direct comparison with gold-standard psychophysical testing. For instance, P300-based VA mirrors psychophysical deficits in amblyopia better than VEP-based methods. The P300 serves as a valuable objective complement to traditional visual electrophysiology, bridging the gap between physiological stimulus processing and conscious perception. While challenges such as recording duration still need to be resolved, the ability to use custom-tailored stimuli offers significant potential for forensic evaluations and complex clinical cases in ophthalmology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.