ArticleJournal of mood and anxiety disorders2026
A multi-method evaluation of trait and state-sensitive impulsivity in relation to impulsiveness of suicide attempts and non-suicidal self-injury in an adolescent clinical sample.
Article in Journal of mood and anxiety disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comment on "A multi-method evaluation of trait and state-sensitive impulsivity in relation to impulsiveness of suicide attempts and non-suicidal self-injury in an adolescent clinical sample".Journal of mood and anxiety disorders · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Understanding the heterogeneity of suicide attempts (SA), and non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) - e.g., impulsiveness of these behaviors, as in the length of time between participants' thought of engaging in the relevant self-injurious behavior and acting on the thought - is an important step towards personalized intervention. Although impulsivity has been extensively studied in relation to SA and NSSI, much less work has evaluated impulsivity in relation to impulsiveness of these behaviors. This study assessed whether trait and state-sensitive impulsivity were associated with impulsiveness of SA and NSSI, respectively, in an adolescent inpatient sample. Methods: Adolescents (N = 146) were recruited from a psychiatric inpatient facility. Multiple regression models examined whether trait impulsivity via self-report (i.e., lack of premeditation, lack of perseverance, sensation-seeking, and negative urgency) and state-sensitive impulsivity via the stop-signal task (SST) were associated with impulsiveness of SA and NSSI, respectively. Results: Lack of premeditation was positively associated with impulsiveness of SA. Greater impulsivity, as reflected by worse impulse inhibition on the SST, was also positively related to impulsiveness of SA. Lack of premeditation and low sensation-seeking were associated with the impulsiveness of NSSI. Conclusion: These findings suggest that aspects of trait and state-sensitive impulsivity are differentially associated with impulsiveness of SA and NSSI. Collectively, these findings support the view that despite phenotypic overlap between these forms of self-injurious behaviors, important distinctions exist in their underlying correlates. They also support impulsiveness of these behaviors as a meaningfully manifestation of their heterogeneity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.