ReviewFrontiers in neurorobotics2026
Exoskeleton robotics: from rigid structures to bio-integrated systems.
Review in Frontiers in neurorobotics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Exoskeleton robots have become a representative class of wearable robotic systems for rehabilitation, mobility assistance, occupational support, and human performance augmentation. As the field moves from laboratory prototypes toward clinical, industrial, and daily life deployment, research priorities are shifting from device-centered performance improvement to human-centered integration. This mini review provides a structured and critically oriented synthesis of exoskeleton technologies from four interconnected perspectives: technical architecture, technological paradigm evolution, deployment barriers, and future research directions. To improve transparency and reproducibility, we adopted a narrative review strategy with explicit literature selection criteria. Publications were identified from major scientific databases using combinations of keywords related to exoskeleton robotics, actuation, control, human-robot interaction, soft robotics, neural interfaces, rehabilitation, and wearable assistance. Representative studies were selected according to relevance, technical influence, clinical or engineering significance, and coverage of major technological paradigms. The review first analyzes three core technical dimensions-actuation systems, control strategies, and human-robot interaction which jointly determine the performance, adaptability, and usability of exoskeleton systems. Rather than only summarizing these technologies, we compare their trade-offs in terms of power density, control precision, compliance, energy efficiency, personalization, safety, and deployment readiness. The review then examines the evolution from rigid exoskeletons, which provide high structural support and precise force transmission, to soft exoskeletons, which improve compliance and comfort, and further to bio-integrated systems that combine neural interfaces, functional electrical stimulation, multimodal sensing, and mechanical assistance. Based on this synthesis, we organize the review using a Human-Exoskeleton Integration Maturity Framework spanning mechanical coupling, physical compliance, functional adaptation, and cognitive/bio-integrated coupling. Persistent barriers, including energy supply, personalization, safety assurance, cost, regulatory translation, and ethical governance, are critically discussed. Finally, future directions are outlined, including neural-interface-driven control, multimodal perception, human-in-the-loop optimization, hybrid rigid-soft architectures, and socially responsible design. Overall, this review argues that the next stage of exoskeleton development will depend not merely on stronger actuators or more intelligent algorithms, but on integrated systems that are adaptive, trustworthy, affordable, and seamlessly embedded in human movement and function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.