ArticleCureus2026
A Cross-Sectional Study on the Knowledge, Awareness, Myths, and Acceptability of Menstrual Cups Among Adolescent Girls in Nagamangala Taluk.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Menstrual cups are a safe, cost-effective, and sustainable menstrual hygiene product; however, their awareness and acceptability among adolescents remain low due to socio-cultural barriers and misconceptions. The study aimed to assess the knowledge, awareness, myths, and acceptability of menstrual cups among adolescent girls and to evaluate factors influencing their willingness to use them. Materials and methods A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 812 adolescent girls aged 13-19 years in Nagamangala taluk, Karnataka, from February to April 2026. Data were collected using a pre-tested semi-structured questionnaire. Knowledge was categorized as adequate when >50% responses were correct. Associations were analyzed using the chi-squared test, with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results Awareness of menstrual cups was observed in 308 (37.9%) participants. Adequate knowledge was present in 342 (42.1%), while myths and misconceptions were reported by 498 (61.3%). The most common misconception was fear of pain during insertion 362 (44.6%). Overall, 548 (67.5%) participants expressed willingness to use menstrual cups. Awareness increased significantly with age (χ² = 9.82, p = 0.002). Willingness was significantly higher among those aware, 220 (71.4%), compared to those not aware, 328 (65.1%) (χ² = 4.21, p = 0.040). Adequate knowledge was associated with higher acceptability (χ² = 14.7, p < 0.001), while the presence of myths was associated with lower willingness (χ² = 41.6, p < 0.001). Conclusion Despite low awareness and prevalent misconceptions, the acceptability of menstrual cups was relatively high, particularly after exposure to appropriate information. Strengthening menstrual health education and addressing myths may improve the adoption of menstrual cups among adolescents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.