Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42434662›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Maternal Satisfaction and Childbirth Experience Following Vaginal Delivery Versus Cesarean Section: A Systematic Review.

Majed Almutairi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Majed AlmutairiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Rabigh, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Childbirth is a crucial experience that impacts women's lives, and the choice between vaginal delivery and cesarean section (C-section) is a critical decision in obstetrics. Maternal satisfaction is influenced by multiple factors since the childbirth experience is a composite of physical, emotional, and social components. Understanding patient evaluation is crucial for providing patient-centered care and improving maternity and neonatal care services. This systematic review aimed to compare patient satisfaction between vaginal and cesarean delivery patients and identify influencing factors. We performed a thorough search of databases for studies published between 2000 and 2024 on patient-reported satisfaction with vaginal delivery vs. C-section interventions. Eligible studies were assessed for methodological quality and relevance. The findings indicated that most women were satisfied with their delivery experience, with vaginal delivery leading to higher satisfaction than C-sections. Factors influencing satisfaction include maternal education, domicile, planned delivery care, healthcare professional gender, complications, partners' education, pain control measures, Apgar scores, and injuries. However, satisfaction levels were not significantly different across other maternal demographic factors or pregnancy-related characteristics. Certain features, such as planned pregnancy and excellent prenatal care, improved satisfaction with both vaginal and cesarean deliveries. The presence of a supporting companion during birth significantly boosted satisfaction levels, especially in primary care settings. Inadequate communication is associated with decreased maternal satisfaction. Therefore, healthcare practitioners should prioritize patient-centered care, good communication, and support. Targeted interventions are recommended, considering factors that influence the delivery of maternal and child care services.

Indexed as

cesarean sectionmaternal care satisfactionmode of deliverypatient experiencepatient’s satisfactionsystematic reviewvaginal delivery

Identifiers

PMID42434662
PMCPMC13354281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.