ArticleEuropean journal of midwifery2026
Attitudes, interest and involvement of midwives in an RCT: A qualitative study with a phenomenological approach.
Article in European journal of midwifery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIn order to improve evidence-based, woman-centered care, research is an essential component of midwifery professional practice. The active involvement of clinical midwives in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) remains modest, despite its acknowledged relevance. The study aims to explore attitudes, interest, and involvement of midwives in an RCT.
methodsA qualitative study informed by descriptive phenomenology was conducted in a second-level maternity unit in Northern Italy. Twenty-one clinical midwives participated in four focus groups prior to the implementation of an RCT evaluating a non-pharmacological intrapartum intervention. Data were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using thematic analysis supported by NVivo software.
resultsFour themes were identified: 1) Using research to inform practice; 2) Challenges related to RCT design features; 3) Challenges related to midwives' involvement; and 4) Strategies to support midwives' involvement. Midwives perceived research as essential for improving care, strengthening professional identity, and advancing midwifery within the scientific community. Evidence generation was closely linked to their commitment to woman-centered care and professional advocacy. However, RCT participation generated tensions between protocol adherence and individualized care. Increased workload, procedural complexity, and cognitive demands within busy clinical settings were described as key barriers. Facilitators included supportive leadership, the presence of a dedicated reference person, peer collaboration, preparatory and ongoing meetings, and alignment between research topics and clinical practice.
conclusionsMidwives' engagement in RCTs is shaped not only by organizational factors but also by professional identity and relational values. Supportive research environments and structured mentorship may enhance meaningful participation and contribute to a sustainable research culture within midwifery practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.