Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42434596›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oral health2026

Oral implanomics: transitioning from experience-based discipline to AI-driven therapeutic paradigm - radiomics and artificial intelligence in oral implantology.

Hongyang Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hongyang MaSecond Affliated Hospital, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oral implantology has experienced substantial digital transformation over the past two decades. The adoption of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), computer-assisted surgery, and artificial intelligence (AI) has improved diagnostic accuracy, treatment planning, and procedural precision. However, clinical decision-making remains largely dependent on conventional radiographic interpretation and clinician experience. We propose the concept of Implanomics (Implant-Omics) as an integrative framework combining radiomics, AI, and digital workflows. Radiomics, which converts medical images into quantitative data, offers new opportunities to extract imaging biomarkers from routine CBCT examinations. By characterizing bone morphology, trabecular architecture, and image texture beyond visual assessment, radiomics may support more objective evaluation of implant sites and improve prediction of treatment outcomes. When combined with machine-learning algorithms, these imaging-derived features can be incorporated into predictive models for risk assessment, implant planning, and longitudinal monitoring. In this Perspective, we discuss the evolution of implant dentistry from experience-based planning toward imaging-driven decision support and examine the emerging role of radiomics and AI in precision implant care. We highlight current applications, key challenges, and future directions for integrating quantitative imaging analysis into clinical workflows. Although substantial validation and implementation challenges remain, the convergence of radiomics, artificial intelligence, and digital implant technologies may contribute to more individualized and evidence-informed treatment strategies in implant dentistry.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecone-beam computed tomographymachine learningoral implantologyprecision dentistryradiomics

Identifiers

PMID42434596
PMCPMC13350176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.