ReviewFrontiers in oral health2026
A conceptual clinical reasoning framework for early syndromic recognition in dental practice.
Review in Frontiers in oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Oral and craniofacial findings are reported in more than 900 genetic syndromes, yet their relevance at the chairside is often unclear. Dentists routinely encounter these features as isolated observations, while most available literature-being syndrome-centered-provides limited guidance on when a finding should be considered clinically significant. Delayed recognition of syndromic patterns leads to missed opportunities for early intervention. Methods: We conducted a narrative review integrating evidence from syndromic dentistry, epidemiology, and clinical reasoning. A sentinel finding was defined as a common oral or craniofacial feature that, when present beyond a defined threshold or in a characteristic pattern, increases the likelihood of an underlying syndromic condition. Using predefined selection criteria, six sentinel findings were identified. Results: For each finding, we specify when it becomes clinically relevant, outline associated syndromes and genetic links, and indicate what to elicit on history and examination, including extraoral features. These elements are considered together within a four-step analytical pathway, which distinguishes findings suitable for monitoring from those requiring referral. Conclusions: This feature-based framework is designed to guide decisions when routine findings raise suspicion of an underlying syndrome. By structuring how such features are interpreted, it aims to reduce diagnostic uncertainty and facilitate earlier recognition in practice. The framework remains conceptual and requires prospective validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.