ArticleJournal of spine surgery (Hong Kong)2026
Accuracy of a high-resolution augmented reality (AR) guidance system with novel 3D stereoscopic targeting for spinal surgery.
Article in Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Augmented reality (AR) is increasingly transforming the landscape of spine surgery by offering enhanced visualization of anatomical structures in real time, directly overlaid onto the surgical field. The study objective was to determine the accuracy of a novel high-resolution AR system with novel three-dimensional (3D) stereoscopic targeting in pedicle screw insertion and to compare it with published studies on existing AR, navigation, and robotic systems. Methods: Eighty pedicle screws were inserted using a novel high-resolution AR system (minimally invasive 55, open 25; thoracic 34, lumbosacral 46). Heary and Gertzbein-Robbins grading was applied, assessing the degree of pedicle breaches on postoperative CT scans. 3D measurements of positional error (PE) and angular error (AE) were performed by comparing post-operative CT scans of implanted screws with planned trajectories. Results: Seventy-six screws placed had Heary grade I. Four screws had a larger diameter than the pedicle and were planned with an in-out-in technique with an intended Heary grade II. Screw placement accuracy rate defined as the percentage of implantations with Heary grades I and II and Gertzbein-Robbins grades A and B was 100%. PE and AE (mean ± standard deviation) for the novel AR system were 1.1±0.5 mm and 1.3°±0.5°, respectively. Percent increment in PE and AE for different navigation, robotic, and AR systems compared to the novel AR system ranged between 23.7-80.6% and 40.6-79.5%, respectively, with the differences being highly significant for all comparisons. Conclusions: PE and AE for placing pedicle screws are 2-5× smaller for the high-resolution AR system with novel 3D stereoscopic targeting compared to published studies on existing navigation, robotic and AR systems. A PE of 1.1 mm and AE of 1.3° makes this technology particularly suited for small pedicles and challenging anatomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.