Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42434573›Full record

ArticleJournal of spine surgery (Hong Kong)2026

Discal pseudocyst after lumbar tubular microdiscectomy: case report and evidence-informed management with literature review.

Suhail Saad AlAssiri, Abdulelah Tareq Barri, Faisal Meshal Aljehani, Raghad Saad Alabbad, Yasser Asiri, Majed S Abaalkhail

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Suhail Saad AlAssiriOrthopedics Surgery Department, Ministry of the National Guard-Health affairs, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7119-1201
Abdulelah Tareq BarriOrthopedics Surgery Department, Ministry of the National Guard-Health affairs, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-5629-3823
Faisal Meshal AljehaniKing Abdullah International Medical Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0633-4722
Raghad Saad AlabbadCollege of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (KSAU-HS), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9574-3520
Yasser AsiriKing Abdullah International Medical Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6690-1010
Majed S AbaalkhailOrthopedics Surgery Department, Ministry of the National Guard-Health affairs, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Postoperative discal pseudocyst (PDP) is a rare but increasingly recognized cause of recurrent radiculopathy after lumbar discectomy. Although its true incidence, risk factors, and natural history remain poorly defined, awareness of this entity is important to avoid misdiagnosis as recurrent disc herniation. This report describes PDP following tubular microdiscectomy and highlights diagnostic and management considerations. Case Description: A 21-year-old male developed left S1 radiculopathy secondary to an L5-S1 disc protrusion. After 6 weeks of unsuccessful conservative treatment, he underwent left L5-S1 tubular microdiscectomy, which immediately relieved the symptoms. Several months later, identical radicular pain recurred. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated a 1.0 cm extradural cyst at the prior discectomy site (T1-hypointense, T2-hyperintense) with a narrow tract communicating with the L5-S1 disc and compression of the left S1 nerve root without a recurrent disc fragment. We performed revision surgery involving cyst drainage, cyst wall excision, and coagulation of the annular defect. Histopathology confirmed a fibrous pseudocyst. The patient's symptoms resolved completely postoperatively. Conclusions: PDP should be considered in patients presenting with recurrent radiculopathy after lumbar discectomy. Recognition of disc-cyst communication on MRI is critical for accurate diagnosis and differentiation from recurrent disc herniation. A stepwise management approach, ranging from observation to minimally invasive drainage or surgical excision with treatment of the annular defect, can result in favorable outcomes and help avoid misdiagnosis as failed back surgery syndrome.

Indexed as

lumbar discectomymicrodiscectomymicroscopic spine surgeryPostoperative discal pseudocyst (PDP)recurrent radiculopathy

Identifiers

PMID42434573
PMCPMC13351945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.