ArticleJournal of spine surgery (Hong Kong)2026
Discal pseudocyst after lumbar tubular microdiscectomy: case report and evidence-informed management with literature review.
Article in Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Postoperative discal pseudocyst (PDP) is a rare but increasingly recognized cause of recurrent radiculopathy after lumbar discectomy. Although its true incidence, risk factors, and natural history remain poorly defined, awareness of this entity is important to avoid misdiagnosis as recurrent disc herniation. This report describes PDP following tubular microdiscectomy and highlights diagnostic and management considerations. Case Description: A 21-year-old male developed left S1 radiculopathy secondary to an L5-S1 disc protrusion. After 6 weeks of unsuccessful conservative treatment, he underwent left L5-S1 tubular microdiscectomy, which immediately relieved the symptoms. Several months later, identical radicular pain recurred. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated a 1.0 cm extradural cyst at the prior discectomy site (T1-hypointense, T2-hyperintense) with a narrow tract communicating with the L5-S1 disc and compression of the left S1 nerve root without a recurrent disc fragment. We performed revision surgery involving cyst drainage, cyst wall excision, and coagulation of the annular defect. Histopathology confirmed a fibrous pseudocyst. The patient's symptoms resolved completely postoperatively. Conclusions: PDP should be considered in patients presenting with recurrent radiculopathy after lumbar discectomy. Recognition of disc-cyst communication on MRI is critical for accurate diagnosis and differentiation from recurrent disc herniation. A stepwise management approach, ranging from observation to minimally invasive drainage or surgical excision with treatment of the annular defect, can result in favorable outcomes and help avoid misdiagnosis as failed back surgery syndrome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.