ArticleInternational journal of integrated care
Implementation and Evaluation of an Integrated Care Team for Refugee Health: A Case Study in Ontario, Canada.
Article in International journal of integrated care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Refugees face significant barriers in accessing primary care, often resulting in poorer health outcomes. This case study evaluates the implementation of a multidisciplinary Integrated Care Team (ICT) for refugees, in Ontario, Canada. The aim of the ICT was to transition refugees into primary care practices. Methods: A mixed-methods process evaluation was conducted to assess the implementation and outcomes of the ICT program. Data sources included ethnographic observations, in-depth interviews with ICT staff, clinicians, and refugee patients. Thematic analysis was applied to qualitative data, and program database metrics were analyzed to evaluate patient transitions and service use. Findings: In its first year, the ICT transitioned 664 refugees to primary care, surpassing its goal of 300. Key successes included improved collaboration, enhanced system navigation, and reduced pressure on refugee clinics. Refugee participants reported feeling supported through the ICT program, emphasizing the importance of personalized care and assistance in navigating the healthcare system. The program improved access to primary care, facilitated timely referrals, and addressed social determinants of health. Discussion: The ICT program demonstrates the potential of integrated care to enhance refugee health outcomes. Flexibility, collaboration, and proactive support were essential to its success. Future research should explore long-term impacts and scalability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.