ArticleFrontiers in surgery2026
Comparative analysis of two modified TLICS systems in guiding surgical decision-making for thoracolumbar fractures.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To compare the Novel Modified Thoracolumbar Injury Classification System (NmTLICS) and the China-modified Thoracolumbar Injury Classification System (CN-mTLICS) in guiding surgical decision-making for thoracolumbar fractures. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the complete imaging data of 101 patients with single-level thoracolumbar fractures admitted between January 2021 and December 2023. Two independent observers scored the patients using the traditional TLICS, NmTLICS, and CN-mTLICS systems. Using the actual clinical treatment decision as the "gold standard," inter-observer agreement was assessed with Cohen's Kappa coefficient. Discrimination was evaluated by the area under the ROC curve (AUC) with pairwise DeLong comparison; classification accuracy among the three related systems was compared with a global Cochran's Results: All three scoring systems demonstrated excellent inter-observer agreement, with NmTLICS ( Conclusion: Both NmTLICS and CN-mTLICS reduced the under-triage of severe burst fractures by TLICS, mainly through higher sensitivity and negative predictive value without a significant loss of specificity, and they address complementary dimensions (fracture morphology and intervertebral disc injury, respectively). As these are exploratory single-center findings based on treatment decisions rather than long-term outcomes, prospective multicenter validation is needed before routine clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.