Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42434447›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2026

Comparative analysis of two modified TLICS systems in guiding surgical decision-making for thoracolumbar fractures.

Han Zhang, Junwei Feng, Bing Wu, Jiayi Dou, Jiale Zhang, Huibin Luo, Binbin Tang, Chen Chen, Liqiang Dong, Zhongcheng An and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Han ZhangThe Second School of Clinical Medicine of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Junwei FengThe Second School of Clinical Medicine of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Bing WuThe Second School of Clinical Medicine of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Jiayi DouThe Second School of Clinical Medicine of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Jiale ZhangThe Second School of Clinical Medicine of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Huibin LuoWangjing Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Binbin TangDepartment of Orthopedics II, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Chen ChenDepartment of Orthopedics II, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Liqiang DongDepartment of Orthopedics II, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Zhongcheng An *Spine Center, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Tingyuan Lai *Department of Orthopedics II, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To compare the Novel Modified Thoracolumbar Injury Classification System (NmTLICS) and the China-modified Thoracolumbar Injury Classification System (CN-mTLICS) in guiding surgical decision-making for thoracolumbar fractures. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the complete imaging data of 101 patients with single-level thoracolumbar fractures admitted between January 2021 and December 2023. Two independent observers scored the patients using the traditional TLICS, NmTLICS, and CN-mTLICS systems. Using the actual clinical treatment decision as the "gold standard," inter-observer agreement was assessed with Cohen's Kappa coefficient. Discrimination was evaluated by the area under the ROC curve (AUC) with pairwise DeLong comparison; classification accuracy among the three related systems was compared with a global Cochran's Results: All three scoring systems demonstrated excellent inter-observer agreement, with NmTLICS ( Conclusion: Both NmTLICS and CN-mTLICS reduced the under-triage of severe burst fractures by TLICS, mainly through higher sensitivity and negative predictive value without a significant loss of specificity, and they address complementary dimensions (fracture morphology and intervertebral disc injury, respectively). As these are exploratory single-center findings based on treatment decisions rather than long-term outcomes, prospective multicenter validation is needed before routine clinical application.

Indexed as

CN-mTLICSintervertebral disc injuryNmTLICSsurgical decision-makingthoracolumbar fracturesTLICS

Identifiers

PMID42434447
PMCPMC13350063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.