ArticlePathology oncology research : POR2026
Efficacy and tolerability of scalp cooling in preventing alopecia during (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.
Article in Pathology oncology research : POR, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Modern chemotherapies substantially improve survival rates in patients with breast cancer; however, its associated adverse effects can markedly diminish quality of life. Chemotherapy-induced alopecia is among the most common and distressing side effects. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of the PAXMAN® scalp cooling system in preventing chemotherapy-induced alopecia among women with breast cancer receiving (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: We conducted a prospective clinical study enrolling patients with early-stage breast cancer who received Orbis PAXMAN® scalp cooling during (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy. The extent of alopecia was assessed at the discontinuation of scalp cooling using the CTCAE v5 scale. Patient characteristics-age, menopausal status, hair length, color, quality, and prior treatments (e.g., dyeing, perming), as well as skin type, eye color, comorbidities, alcohol consumption, smoking, and chemotherapy regimen-were recorded. Associations between patient-related factors and the severity of alopecia were analyzed. Patients evaluated pain, cold sensation, and overall tolerability of the cooling process using a visual analogue scale. Results: Fifty female patients were enrolled. The mean age was 52 years (range 31-77); 27 patients were premenopausal and 23 were postmenopausal. Forty-two patients received an anthracycline-based regimen, while eight received anthracycline-free chemotherapy. Treatment discontinuation occurred in 31 cases due to severe alopecia and in one case due to intolerable pain. Grade 1 alopecia was observed in 18 patients (36%). The cooling cap combined with a 60-min post-cooling period demonstrated a promising success rate among patients receiving anthracycline-free regimens (69%), whereas efficacy was less favorable in anthracycline-based protocols (37.5%). Among the examined patient characteristics, only the presence of comorbidities showed a significant association with the severity of alopecia (p = 0.028). Most patients found the scalp cooling system comfortable; the mean scalp pain score was 2.17 and the mean cold sensation score was 3.9 on the visual analogue scale. Conclusion: The Orbis PAXMAN® scalp cooling system is an effective and well-tolerated method for preventing chemotherapy-induced alopecia, particularly in patients receiving anthracycline-free regimens. The presence of comorbidities significantly increased the risk of severe alopecia. While this study confirms that the efficacy of scalp cooling is strongly influenced by the chemotherapy regimen, further research is warranted to optimize patient selection and improve outcomes, especially for those undergoing anthracycline-based therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.