ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2026
A diagnostic performance study of multiplex polymerase chain reaction-based targeted next-generation sequencing for the accurate identification of
Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of multiplex PCR-based targeted next-generation sequencing (mp-tNGS) for detecting Methods: This prospective study enrolled 188 patients. BALF samples were tested in parallel by AFB smear, culture, Xpert MTB/RIF, and mp-tNGS. Diagnostic performance was assessed against a composite clinical reference standard; phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (pDST) was additionally compared in a subset of 35 patients. Results: Among the cohort, 116 patients were diagnosed with PTB. The sensitivities of AFB smear, culture, Xpert MTB/RIF, and mp-tNGS were 19.8%, 33.6%, 73.3%, and 83.6%, respectively; specificities were 91.7%, 100%, 98.6%, and 97.2%. mp-tNGS demonstrated the highest diagnostic accuracy (88.8%) and the strongest agreement with the reference standard (κ = 0.868, Conclusion: The mp-tNGS assay provides a superior combination of rapid turnaround time (~12 hours) and high diagnostic accuracy for MTB detection in BALF. Beyond pathogen identification, it offers rapid and preliminary genotypic resistance screening, supporting early suspicion of multidrug resistance, while phenotypic confirmation remains essential. This makes mp-tNGS a highly effective tool for the rapid, accurate diagnosis and preliminary resistance screening of PTB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.