ArticleDigital biomarkers
Multimodal Machine Learning to Personalize Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation for Stroke Rehabilitation.
Article in Digital biomarkers. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Several studies have identified transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) as a noninvasive neuromodulation technique for improving motor function in individuals with neurological disorders, including stroke. Despite a plethora of preliminary findings, there remains no standardized protocol regarding the optimal tSCS parameters tailored to patients with stroke. The objective of this study was to employ a supervised machine learning (ML) approach to determine the optimal tSCS frequency and intensity parameters for patients with chronic stroke by leveraging data from single-day interventions that systematically varied in frequency and intensity across four stimulation conditions. Methods: Twenty adults with chronic hemiparetic stroke (mean age 53.3 ± 10.8 years; 13 males, 7 females) who were ≥6 months post-stroke was enrolled, excluding individuals with multiple strokes, severe spasticity, or implanted devices. Each participant participated in a baseline session followed by five intervention sessions, during which the frequency and intensity of stimulation were varied randomly. Multimodal sensors, including surface EMG, inertial measurement unit-based kinematics, and spatiotemporal gait parameters, were used to quantify acute changes in gait symmetry, and optimal stimulation frequency and intensity were defined as those yielding the greatest improvement in the combined gait asymmetry metric. A supervised machine-learning classifier was trained using nested leave-one-subject-out cross-validation to predict the optimal stimulation frequency and intensity to maximize differences from the baseline data alone. AUROC values were calculated for the frequency and intensity predictions. Results: The ML models achieved AUROC values of 0.86 [0.75-0.94] for frequency prediction and 0.82 [0.69-0.94] for intensity prediction. The top ten predictive features for each model spanned with spinal motor evoked potentials, wearable sensors, and demographic domains, highlighting multimodal contributions to stimulation optimization. Conclusion: These findings demonstrate that supervised learning can predict individualized tSCS parameters from demographic data and baseline sensor features that yield the greatest improvement in gait symmetry after stroke, representing a promising step toward the data-driven personalization of neuromodulation therapy in neurorehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.