ArticleJCPP advances2026
School absence and mental health service referral: Cohort study of a South London data linkage.
Article in JCPP advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The longitudinal relationship between school absence and mental health has important policy implications; if school absence predicts later mental health problems, it could be used to identify young people at increased risk and enable further assessment, prevention, and early intervention. Methods: We analysed an existing data linkage between the National Pupil Database and healthcare records representing a sample of 47,926 young people aged 11-15 in the UK. We used logistic regression to examine the longitudinal association between persistent school absence (defined by the Government Department for Education in England as missing more than 10% of available school sessions) and later contact with secondary care mental health services. We also compared the sensitivity and positive predictive value of the >10% absence threshold to alternative thresholds for predicting adverse mental health outcomes. Results: At the currently applied threshold of >10%, persistent school absence was associated with 2.77 (95% CI 2.33-3.30, girls) and 1.58 (95% CI 1.29-1.95, boys) times the odds of accepted referral to secondary care mental health services in the following year, after adjustment for sociodemographic and educational factors. The absolute risk difference for girls was 4.7% (95% CI 3.9-5.4) and for boys, 2.8% (95% CI 2.1-3.4). Compared to other thresholds, the >10% absence threshold provided a good balance between sensitivity (40.5%), positive predictive value (5.5%), and identifying a manageable proportion of young people as high risk (18%). Conclusion: The longitudinal relationship between school absence and later secondary care mental health service contact suggests that school absence may be a useful marker for educators to identify children in need of support. The >10% absence threshold used in education policy in England may also serve as a useful marker of later mental health risk in other national policy contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.