ReviewJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2026
The effect of thickness and sintering mode on the impact strength of a graded Zirconia.
Review in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Graded zirconia ceramics balance the high strength of 3Y-TZP with the translucency of 5Y-PSZ through their layered microstructure. However, the mechanical behavior of distinct compositional zones, particularly the transition zone, remains insufficiently characterized under dynamic loading conditions. This study aimed to evaluate the influence of different sintering protocols and thicknesses on the impact strength of graded zirconia. Material and Methods: Specimens were sectioned by layer (3Y-TZP, transition zone, 5Y-PSZ) under two thicknesses (1.0 and 1.5 mm) and two sintering protocols (conventional and speed). Impact strength testing, finite element analysis, and fractographic analysis were performed. A total of 180 bars were tested using the Dynstat method, with results analyzed via three-way ANOVA ( = 0.05). Results: The 3Y-TZP layer exhibited the highest impact strength (46.8-66.7 kJ/m²), followed by the transition zone (23.7-41.9 kJ/m²) and 5Y-PSZ (15.5-28.7 kJ/m²). A significant three-way interaction (F2,168 = 5.080, p = 0.007) was observed, with thicker 5Y-PSZ specimens showing ~45% less resistance under speed sintering. Fractographic analysis revealed intergranular fracture without delamination, confirming structural integrity. Conclusions: The 3Y-TZP layer provides superior impact resistance regardless of processing conditions, while conventional sintering is preferable for thicker 5Y-PSZ layers. These findings inform material selection and manufacturing processes for graded zirconia restorations in high-stress applications.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.