ArticleClinical neurophysiology practice2026
Quantifying motor unit loss prior to functional impairment in muscles affected by amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
Article in Clinical neurophysiology practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The compound muscle action potential (CMAP) scan is a non-invasive method for deriving motor unit number estimates (MUNE) to track disease progression in muscles affected by amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). It remains to be established whether and how long motor unit loss precedes functional impairment. Methods: In 56 patients with ALS, we compared the longitudinal trajectories of MUNE derived from thenar CMAP scans, and fine motor function (FMF) using a functional rating scale. Linear and sigmoidal disease trajectories were modelled from which time differences were estimated between these measures to reach their half-maximum scores. Results: The normalized linear decline per month was 0.02 (95% CI 0.01 to 0.03) for FMF and 0.03 (95% CI 0.03 to 0.04) for MUNE. Half-maximum of FMF was reached after 26.3 months (95% CI 18.9 to 35.1) for the linear model, while MUNE had a shorter time required to reach 50% of its maximum with 13.0 months (95% CI 10.3 to 16.4). The head-to-head comparison between FMF and MUNE showed that MUNE values reached 50% of its maximum 13.1 months (95% CI 7.0-20.8) earlier. Results were similar for sigmoidal disease trajectories. Conclusions: Simulated disease trajectories of MUNE values derived from CMAP scans in muscles affected by ALS indicated that MUNE may reach 50% of its maximum in approximately 60% of the time compared to functional impairment. Significance: These explorative findings underscore how neurophysiological measures may be of use for early disease monitoring, with relevance for both care and research settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.