Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42434153›Full record

ArticleAnnals of gastroenterology

Solid pseudopapillary epithelial neoplasm of the pancreas: an audit of 29 cases operated in a tertiary Indian centre.

Pritesh Kumar N, Vageesh Bg, Anil Agarwal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of gastroenterology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Pritesh Kumar NDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, GB Pant Hospital and Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India (Pritesh Kumar N, Vageesh BG, Anil Agarwal).
Vageesh BgDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, GB Pant Hospital and Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India (Pritesh Kumar N, Vageesh BG, Anil Agarwal).
Anil AgarwalDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, GB Pant Hospital and Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India (Pritesh Kumar N, Vageesh BG, Anil Agarwal).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Solid pseudopapillary epithelial neoplasm (SPEN) of the pancreas is an indolent tumor of rare occurrence seen predominantly in young females in the 2 Method: This is a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of SPEN cases operated at a tertiary care hospital in India from 2011-2023. Results: The cohort consisted of 29 patients with a male: female ratio of 1:8.6, and a median age of 24 years. The majority of the lesions were in the body and tail of the pancreas (65.5%). Mean tumor diameter was 6.1±1.9 cm. Pancreatic resection (9 distal pancreatectomies, 7 Whipple'spancreaticoduodenectomies, 2 central pancreatectomies) was undertaken in the majority of cases (62.1%), while 11 patients (37.9%) underwent enucleation. Additional resections included splenectomy (n=4), segmental colonic resection (n=2), and 1 non-anatomical liver wedge resection for solitary liver metastasis. Mean operative time and blood loss were 222.1±106.1 min and 115.5±85.9 mL, respectively. Minor complications were seen in 7 (24.1%) patients, while 1 patient had a major complication. At a median follow up of 37 months, 28 (96.6%) patients were alive, 1 of whom had local recurrence. Conclusions: SPEN represents an indolent, low-grade malignant tumor that is reasonably diagnosed preoperatively by cross-sectional imaging. The majority of cases are cured by surgical resection, the extent of which is dictated by the location of the tumor and its relation to surrounding structures. Excellent outcomes, both short- and long-term, can be achieved.

Indexed as

enucleationpancreatic resectionSolid pseudopapillary epithelial neoplasm

Identifiers

PMID42434153
PMCPMC13352187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.