ArticleAnnals of gastroenterology
The effect of pembrolizumab on the healing of colonic anastomosis: a pre-clinical study in Wistar rats.
Article in Annals of gastroenterology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pembrolizumab is a monoclonal antibody that targets the programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) protein. Blocking this pathway alters T-cell activity, and has been approved for the treatment of several malignancies, including microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) and mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) colorectal cancers. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of pembrolizumab on colonic anastomotic healing in a rat model. Methods: Sixty male Wistar rats were randomly divided into 2 groups of 30: a control group, and an experimental group receiving pembrolizumab. Each group was further divided into 3 subgroups of 10 rats, sacrificed on postoperative day (POD) 3, 7 or 14. All animals underwent laparotomy, a 1-centimeter segmental colectomy, and an end-to-end colonic anastomosis. Postmortem evaluation included measuring anastomotic bursting pressure, tissue hydroxyproline levels, and histopathological assessment. Results: Statistically significant differences in bursting pressure (P=0.019) and rupture site (P=0.033) were observed between the groups on POD 7. Tissue hydroxyproline levels were significantly lower in the pembrolizumab-treated subgroups on POD 7 (P=0.003), and POD 14 (P=0.001). Histopathological analysis demonstrated significant differences on POD 3, in neovascularization (P=0.026), fibroblast ingrowth (P=0.005), and collagen deposition (P=0.030), suggesting impaired inflammatory-phase healing. Conclusions: This experimental study suggests that a high single dose of pembrolizumab may negatively affect colonic anastomotic healing in rats. Further studies are necessary to determine the safety of intestinal anastomosis in both emergency and elective clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.